首页> 外文OA文献 >Enhanced D1 And D2 Inhibitions Induced By Low-frequency Trains Of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects On H- And T-reflexes And Possible Mechanisms
【2h】

Enhanced D1 And D2 Inhibitions Induced By Low-frequency Trains Of Conditioning Stimuli: Differential Effects On H- And T-reflexes And Possible Mechanisms

机译:低频列车对条件刺激的诱导增强的D1和D2抑制作用:H和T反射的差异作用及其可能的机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mechanically evoked reflexes have been postulated to be less sensitive to presynaptic inhibition (PSI) than the H-reflex. This has implications on investigations of spinal cord neurophysiology that are based on the T-reflex. Preceding studies have shown an enhanced effect of PSI on the H-reflex when a train of similar to 10 conditioning stimuli at 1 Hz was applied to the nerve of the antagonist muscle. The main questions to be addressed in the present study are if indeed T-reflexes are less sensitive to PSI and whether (and to what extent and by what possible mechanisms) the effect of low frequency conditioning, found previously for the H-reflex, can be reproduced on T-reflexes from the soleus muscle. We explored two different conditioning-to-test (C-T) intervals: 15 and 100 ms (corresponding to D1 and D2 inhibitions, respectively). Test stimuli consisted of either electrical pulses applied to the posterior tibial nerve to elicit H-reflexes or mechanical percussion to the Achilles tendon to elicit T-reflexes. The 1 Hz train of conditioning electrical stimuli delivered to the common peroneal nerve induced a stronger effect of PSI as compared to a single conditioning pulse, for both reflexes (T and H), regardless of C-T-intervals. Moreover, the conditioning train of pulses (with respect to a single conditioning pulse) was proportionally more effective for T-reflexes as compared to H-reflexes (irrespective of the C-T interval), which might be associated with the differential contingent of Ia afferents activated by mechanical and electrical test stimuli. A conceivable explanation for the enhanced PSI effect in response to a train of stimuli is the occurrence of homosynaptic depression at synapses on inhibitory interneurons interposed within the PSI pathway. The present results add to the discussion of the sensitivity of the stretch reflex pathway to PSI and its functional role.
机译:据推测,机械诱发的反射对突触前抑制(PSI)的敏感性低于H反射。这对基于T反射的脊髓神经生理学的研究具有影响。先前的研究表明,当向拮抗肌的神经施加类似于10个1 Hz条件刺激的刺激时,PSI对H反射的作用增强。在本研究中要解决的主要问题是,T反射是否确实对PSI不太敏感,以及先前对于H反射发现的低频调节作用是否(以及在何种程度上以及通过何种可能的机制)是否可以从比目鱼肌的T反射中复制出来。我们探索了两个不同的条件测试间隔(C-T):15和100 ms(分别对应于D1和D2抑制)。测试刺激包括对胫后神经施加电脉冲以引起H反射或对跟腱进行机械打击以引起T反射。与单个调节脉冲相比,传递给腓总神经的1 Hz调节电刺激序列对单个反射脉冲(T和H)的PSI效果更强,而与C-T间隔无关。此外,脉冲调节序列(相对于单个调节脉冲)与H反射(与CT间隔无关)相比,对T反射成比例地更有效(与CT间隔无关),这可能与激活的Ia传入微分队有关通过机电测试的刺激。响应一系列刺激而增强的PSI效果的一种可能的解释是插入在PSI途径内的抑制性中间神经元的突触上发生同态突触抑制。目前的结果增加了对PSI伸展反射途径的敏感性及其功能作用的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号